Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:41:32 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 18:30:57, Albert Silver wrote: >You can claim the above is sarcasm, but sarcasm is an exaggeration of the truth >or perceived truth. The above implies the engine isn't all it is touted to be >(it was touted to be 90-150 points stronger than Shredder 9), that it is >unusually expensive, and that one can expect a long wait. One would indeed think >we are being duped. > Albert, your long message which I snipped for better reading sounds like filibustering. And Pete does good if he stops answering. It's impossible for a single writer to answer all these aspects. But let me set the record straight why you and also others argue in a very unfair, almost indecent manner. In fact we, and I, are being duped. Here is the reason why: the customers pay Vas for allowing the testing of his versions and Vas and all are enjoying the conversations, and the only one who must pay MORE for the actual traffic high is the host of this forum. Even the customers who pay Vas dont pay Steve! That is NOT a problem for you, I assume? - Well this is my point. This isnt sound, Albert. This traffic itself is commercial advertising.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.