Author: Hans Christian Lykke
Date: 06:53:15 04/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 1999 at 05:03:12, blass uri wrote: > >On April 10, 1999 at 10:41:03, Harald Faber wrote: > > >>Who knows...what I suspect is that, opposite to what many people DENY, SSDF has >>MUCH influence on the sales. > >I hope that they do not have much influence. > >The main problem with the ssdf list is that most of the games are not public and >I cannot know if the testers played the not public games or only reported >results without playing games. Oh, Uri, please - if you continue this way, there will be NO SSDF list in the future. I see no alternative to the SSDF-list Venlig hilsen Hans Christian Lykke SSDF-tester > >I think that gambitsoft should tell the customers about this problem and not >publish a new ssdf rating list without telling the customers that most of the >games (including many games of the new programs) are not public. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.