Author: Lar Mader
Date: 19:06:53 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
>Albert, > >your long message which I snipped for better reading sounds like filibustering. >And Pete does good if he stops answering. It's impossible for a single writer to >answer all these aspects. But let me set the record straight why you and also >others argue in a very unfair, almost indecent manner. > >In fact we, and I, are being duped. Here is the reason why: the customers pay >Vas for allowing the testing of his versions and Vas and all are enjoying the >conversations, and the only one who must pay MORE for the actual traffic high is >the host of this forum. Even the customers who pay Vas dont pay Steve! That is >NOT a problem for you, I assume? - > >Well this is my point. This isnt sound, Albert. This traffic itself is >commercial advertising. Sorry, bud, that's what we call "the breaks". We have the charter rules for the forum. If they're not working, perhaps they need to be changed. We have moderators that enforce the rules, and the only post Vas made of a commercial nature was appropriately remove. This is all normal. You seem to want a new charter rule - no threads allowed that increase traffic too much. Or no threads that discuss a commercial engine because that's actually advertising for it. Maybe we need a "no Rybka discussions" thread rule. That would do it. Except we'd need a no Fritz, Shredder, Hiarcs, Gandolph, etc. rule too. It's unfortunate that traffic is so high on this forum. Maybe lower traffic is better. Hey, how bout no traffic. That would save Steve a butt load. People need to follow Albert's advice. Regular Yoga. I'm prescribing 5 days for you because of this unbelievable nonsense. -= Lar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.