Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:30:34 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >thread. > >As per the charter: > >Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >messages: > > 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > 2. Are not abusive in nature > 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others > 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations > 5. Are not of questionable legal status. > >What about rule #4 do you not understand? > >Peter Peter, you have to do your job, I realize this, but you don't need to insult Vasik. Yes, he broke, or maybe better put bent rule no. 4. You have broke or at least bent rule no. 2&3. You should have dealt with this problem via e-mail, rather than pit the CCC community against itself! Also, Vasiks original post remains, so it couldn't have upset the other moderators too much. I didn't read the thread that has since been deleted, and apparently that was the real problem, as it's erased. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.