Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: one general request to CCRL people

Author: Chessfun

Date: 21:00:28 02/12/06

On February 12, 2006 at 19:04:55, Heinz van Kempen wrote:

>On February 12, 2006 at 17:20:31, Ray Banks wrote:

>>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/rating-table-all.shtml

>>We currently have a difference of 42 ELO Rybka 64 bit vs 32 bit. Our time
>>control is more than twice as long as CEGT though, and that could have an
>>impact. Plus our volume of games is fairly low so the statistical error is
>>somewhat higher unfortunately  :-(

>As we have totally different concepts and because of the history all this has
>had I would suggest to avoid any comparison between our groups, at least from
>CCRL people. We did not do this from our side and it would be fair that you also
>avoid it.

There was no comparison between groups made, simply a statement of fact.

Sarah

Re: one general request to CCRL people Heinz van Kempen 00:05:36 02/13/06
- Re: one general request to CCRL people Chessfun 03:12:13 02/13/06
  - Re: one general request to CCRL people Heinz van Kempen 03:25:31 02/13/06
    - Re: one general request to CCRL people Chessfun 03:47:34 02/13/06
      - Re: one general request to CCRL people Heinz van Kempen 04:11:21 02/13/06
        
        Re: one general request to CCRL people Chessfun 15:50:05 02/13/06
        
        Re: one general request to CCRL people Ray Banks 05:38:44 02/13/06
        
        Re: one general request to CCRL people Greg Simpson 21:59:35 02/13/06
        
        Re: one general request to CCRL people Ray Banks 22:44:08 02/13/06
        
        Correction Ray Banks 05:39:55 02/13/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.