Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 00:29:19 02/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >thread. > >As per the charter: > >Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >messages: > > 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > 2. Are not abusive in nature > 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others > 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations > 5. Are not of questionable legal status. > >What about rule #4 do you not understand? > >Peter I think the moderation team should clarify rule #4. My post did not: 1) Talk positively about Rybka 2) Make any commercial mention (website, price) Further, my topic has general computer chess interest. How is this commercial, when (for example) the collector's corner stuff is not? (Just to clarify - I have absolutely no problem with the collector's corner. It's just that there will always be some brushing up with commercial issues.) Vas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.