Author: Pedro Gomes
Date: 04:44:37 02/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 05:57:27, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 13, 2006 at 05:45:08, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>One of the arguments about posting so much about rybka is that it costs too much >>money. >> >>I would like to make a donation to offset the costs of any of my posts. How much >>does it cost per, say 100 words. What is a reasonable donation? or maybe a >>better way to ask this is, "how much would the average poster cost per year in >>posts?" >> >>By the way, I really don't think the flood of rybka posts is really hurting >>anybody. It is not hard to ignore such threads. If people want to talk >>programing, then who is stoping them? If people want to find programing threads, >>it is not hard to scroll through and find them. >> >>And, importantly, rybka is what many people are interested in. It plays some >>beautiful chess. Why deny people this small joy of talking about it? >> >> >> >> >>best >>Joseph > > >You are completely missing the point. Nobody wants to miss the topics with >Rybka. But Vas shouldnt be the only one who makes a financial profit while >misusing the forum CCC for free. And this is something Vas should negotiate with >Steve via email. Pete just made the conflict public. Normally Vas is violating ยง >4 of the charter. Most visibly in his posting where he expected feedback for the >future marketing and selling of Rybka. That was enough. Also IMO. Finally, you are right in a topic about Rybka. Beeter late than never. HFP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.