Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:22:16 02/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 10:08:05, Steve B wrote:
>> The heat was not for the delete of that post, but for the WAY one of the
>>modarators present it.... He should delete it with no ironic comments, just
>>sending an email to the poster with a warning....
>
>actually no
>some members are commenting on the aspect of Vas's post..as to wether or not it
>is even a commercial advert and if it is even in violstion of charter provision
>#4 which it clearly is
>
>i do not ask the Sponser to comment on the comments made by the Mod in the post
>deletion notification
>
>
>Steve
But you did suggest ICD be compensated for any revenue generated by Rybka,
despite the fact that no one has ever made such a suggestion about any program,
since the inception of the forum. Not Chess Tiger, Fruit, Gandalf, Hiarcs, you
name it. Why Rybka is somehow singled out is a mystery to me frankly. And if you
want to complain about the amount of posts here on Rybka, it isn't due to any
special marketing techniques, but to its unique character (new name and unusual
strength). All I've seen done is to announce its existence, and then answer
questions or comments made on it.
Anyhow, if you think the board is crazy now, just wait til another program
reaches parity or beats Rybka....
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.