Author: Mark Young
Date: 18:19:16 04/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 1999 at 20:07:56, Brian Smith wrote: > >Hm... very interesting these results (at least in my opinion). Who usually >wins the games between Chessmaster 6000 and Hiarcs 7 at G/30 min on your >computer? Hiarcs 7 wins most of the games at G/30. Why do you think CM has such a big lead. You can play over the games and see if you agree, but it seems clear to me that CM 6000 is just better at getting its pieces out and coordinated in shuffle chess, Hiarcs7 seems clueless. As a result Hiarcs7 is getting positionally crushed game after game. Because the games usually >involve lots of tactics? Chessmaster is very strong in tactics, but so is Hiarcs7 Does Hiarcs have a good book and CM a bad one? Hiarcs7 have an outstanding book, CM book is so so. IMO > >I would be interested in a shuffle game where the knights are inside of the >bishops (but otherwise everything is the same). I will play a game with that setup. > >Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.