Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 13:16:18 02/13/06
Ok, it is clear that many people are not too happy with the number of rybka posts and i can respect that. I am just wondering? what is approriate and inapproriate to post? If we can come up with specific answers to this question, perhaps we can reduce disagreement. Here are some ideas *****innapproriate rybka posts. Commercial discussions of rybka (e.g., discussions about subscriptions) *****Approriate rybka posts games played by rybka that are interesting or instructive. Tournements involving rybka. tournements testing different rybka parameters (similer to the cm10 tournis) *****I am not sure if approriate Technical problems about rybka. Bugs. etc (but don't people do this for other engines, even commercial ones?) Tests between different betas ( I personally find this interesting, but maybe it is supporting commercial interests and violates rule number 4?) Very short blitz or bullet tournments (e.g., a tourni consisting of 10 games with 5 minute per game time control) posts that say nothing more than "rybka is great." Maybe some people can make suggestions ? I am at a loss. best Joseph
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.