Author: Greg Simpson
Date: 21:59:35 02/13/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 08:38:44, Ray Banks wrote: >On February 13, 2006 at 07:11:21, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >>It is ridiculous when you mention again and again that you are using twice as >>much time and you do not need this to gain some profile. > >I've mentioned this myself a couple of times, not to gain profile or to imply it >is better. I've done it because in your posts you always state "CEGT 40/40 2GHz >time control". You miss out the important word "Intel". I've always been >concerned, including when I was a member of CEGT, that people may not know >that. An AMD64 3200+ runs at 2GHz and thus it could be interpreted that your >time control is actually much longer than it is. If you'd amend your future >posts to say "CEGT 404/40 Intel 2GHz time control" then people have absolute >clarity. It is a very decent time control, and takes nothing away from CEGT's >work or ratings list, which is superb. I always look at your updates ! Of course >this is entirely up to you, and please take this in the conciliatory tone that >it is intended. With Intel's various processors out now it should probably be Intel Pentium IV 2GHz for more clarity. It begins to get unwieldy though.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.