Author: Mark Young
Date: 22:13:18 04/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 1999 at 01:11:06, Dave Gomboc wrote: >Are you multi-tasking these on the same computer? No, running on 2 PII 400 systems. > >Dave Gomboc > >On April 11, 1999 at 21:19:16, Mark Young wrote: > >>On April 11, 1999 at 20:07:56, Brian Smith wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Hm... very interesting these results (at least in my opinion). Who usually >>>wins the games between Chessmaster 6000 and Hiarcs 7 at G/30 min on your >>>computer? >> >>Hiarcs 7 wins most of the games at G/30. >> >>Why do you think CM has such a big lead. >> >>You can play over the games and see if you agree, but it seems clear to me that >>CM 6000 is just better at getting its pieces out and coordinated in shuffle >>chess, Hiarcs7 seems clueless. As a result Hiarcs7 is getting positionally >>crushed game after game. >> >> Because the games usually >>>involve lots of tactics? >> >>Chessmaster is very strong in tactics, but so is Hiarcs7 >> >> Does Hiarcs have a good book and CM a bad one? >> >>Hiarcs7 have an outstanding book, CM book is so so. IMO >> >>> >>>I would be interested in a shuffle game where the knights are inside of the >>>bishops (but otherwise everything is the same). >> >>I will play a game with that setup. >> >>> >>>Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.