Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 02:35:36 02/14/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2006 at 01:40:10, George Speight wrote: > >I admit that i dont know much about the charter. Peter felt he had his reasons.I >will still say i think he could have handled it in a more appropriate way. I >feel he slammed Vas in public, and he should have handled that in private. But >it occured to me that I am no better. I slammed Peter in public, and i should >have aired my feelings on that in private with him. He and i obviously dont >agree on a lot of things, but if i am going to critcize him, then i have to look >at my actions also. And when i look back at my posts, my choice of words leave a >lot to be desired also. Up to this line it looks like personell insight. So we are all imperfect. I have a suggestion. This conclusion seams not very logical. When you do something wrong why can you then conclude "so we are all imperfect"? Wouldn't it sound more logical to write "so I'm imperfect"? Peter >stays on as mod., we all make our posts on tourn. results or whatever, and try >to get along. Life is too short for all this crap. Best regards, George Let's respect Peter's decision. He has good reason to resign. Others have good reasons too, but they stay. Great tournament. Keep up the good work. Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.