Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 04:06:12 02/14/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 16:16:18, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >Ok, it is clear that many people are not too happy with the number of rybka >posts and i can respect that. I am just wondering? what is approriate and >inapproriate to post? If we can come up with specific answers to this question, >perhaps we can reduce disagreement. > >Here are some ideas > > >*****innapproriate rybka posts. > >Commercial discussions of rybka (e.g., discussions about subscriptions) > > >*****Approriate rybka posts > >games played by rybka that are interesting or instructive. >Tournements involving rybka. >tournements testing different rybka parameters (similer to the cm10 tournis) > >*****I am not sure if approriate > >Technical problems about rybka. Bugs. etc (but don't people do this for other >engines, even commercial ones?) > >Tests between different betas ( I personally find this interesting, but maybe it >is supporting commercial interests and violates rule number 4?) > >Very short blitz or bullet tournments (e.g., a tourni consisting of 10 games >with 5 minute per game time control) I beg you to differ, I prefer blitz, not that I post results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.