Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation !!

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 09:42:51 02/16/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 16, 2006 at 03:55:03, Bernhard Bauer wrote:

>On February 15, 2006 at 13:28:31, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 15, 2006 at 10:27:38, William Penn wrote:
>>
>>>On February 15, 2006 at 09:30:34, Sune Larsson wrote:
>>>
>>>>4 Rybkas in the header should be the absolute limit. Not 5 - that's way too
>>>>much...;-)
>>>>
>>>>/S
>>>
>>>I dunno...
>>>I think 5 is OK, but 10 is too much.
>>>:)
>>>WP
>>
>>
>>Sorry, but I think this entire thread is "brain-dead".
>>
>
>I fully agree. But this is not the only one thread which is or has been
>"brain-dead". And it has to do with past moderation.
>
>>If you like, I can suggest to Graham that we both resign and you can get a taste
>>of CCC with no moderation at all.
>
>If you both resign we will elect new moderators. So CCC will not be without
>moderation.
>
>>
>>I doubt you'll like it.
>>
>>So how about laying off the thinly veiled insults directed toward the
>>moderators?
>
>I cannot see insults in this thread directed to moderators. But I have seen
>insults from the moderators to members.
>Bob, your question asked in another thread to me "when will you leave?" isn't
>that an insult?

What about this (paraphrased):

"Peter had good reasons to leave.  Others (emphasis on trailing "s") also have
good reasons to leave but don't."

That was about _moderators_.  Since there are only three, and peter had already
resigned (starting the thread) "others" _must_ mean both Graham and Myself.  So
is _that_ not an insult to start with???

I didn't ask to be a moderator, contrary to some stupid statement made
previously.  I agreed to moderate if elected from a feeling of duty to CCC since
I've been here from day 1.


>Otherwise I have no issue with you.
>I don't want CCC to be without moderation, but this time moderators have failed
>to do their job properly.


And there we disagree.  blatant commercial stuff really belongs somewhere else.
The charter is not vague or unclear about that point.

>
>Bernhard



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.