Author: Chessfun
Date: 18:07:02 02/16/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2006 at 19:24:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 16, 2006 at 18:37:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 16, 2006 at 18:28:31, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2006 at 17:58:27, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>As this table shows other engines like Spike 1.0 and SmarThink are far closer to >>>>Fruit than Rybka. As for Toga the numbers speak for themselves. >>>> >>>>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/engine-distance-table-all.shtml >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>> >>>I doubt that these results have a bigger meaning but just an impression: it >>>looks as if Hiarcs has bought something from Chess Tiger. >> >>I think that simply not enough moves were played. >> >>98 moves are not enough. >> >>Uri > >I saw it here > >http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/eval-difference-table-best-limited.shtml > >but you are right, this is strange. Allegedly it is 150 games but only 98 moves >counted... So therefore all in all I concluded that the tables have no value. >Also the background of the tables isnt discussed at all. Why this and what >exactly... That isnt sound. I see we two are agreeing here, Uri. Rolf, You should read more before posting something like that. It isn't strange at all the pair you made an assumption about have played only a couple of games. http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/pairwise-results-all.shtml Plus you didn't look at the link I provided and read what was written. Then you make an assumption about a difference table after I posted distance. Sarah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.