Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 23:21:37 02/16/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2006 at 12:42:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 16, 2006 at 03:55:03, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On February 15, 2006 at 13:28:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2006 at 10:27:38, William Penn wrote: >>> >>>>On February 15, 2006 at 09:30:34, Sune Larsson wrote: >>>> >>>>>4 Rybkas in the header should be the absolute limit. Not 5 - that's way too >>>>>much...;-) >>>>> >>>>>/S >>>> >>>>I dunno... >>>>I think 5 is OK, but 10 is too much. >>>>:) >>>>WP >>> >>> >>>Sorry, but I think this entire thread is "brain-dead". >>> >> >>I fully agree. But this is not the only one thread which is or has been >>"brain-dead". And it has to do with past moderation. >> >>>If you like, I can suggest to Graham that we both resign and you can get a taste >>>of CCC with no moderation at all. >> >>If you both resign we will elect new moderators. So CCC will not be without >>moderation. >> >>> >>>I doubt you'll like it. >>> >>>So how about laying off the thinly veiled insults directed toward the >>>moderators? >> >>I cannot see insults in this thread directed to moderators. But I have seen >>insults from the moderators to members. >>Bob, your question asked in another thread to me "when will you leave?" isn't >>that an insult? > >What about this (paraphrased): > >"Peter had good reasons to leave. Others (emphasis on trailing "s") also have >good reasons to leave but don't." > >That was about _moderators_. Since there are only three, and peter had already >resigned (starting the thread) "others" _must_ mean both Graham and Myself. To say it more clear: Others mean Graham and not you. I have no issue with you. Your way of moderation looks acceptable to me. So >is _that_ not an insult to start with??? > >I didn't ask to be a moderator, contrary to some stupid statement made >previously. I agreed to moderate if elected from a feeling of duty to CCC since OK. >I've been here from day 1. I know, since I have been here from day 1 too. > > >>Otherwise I have no issue with you. >>I don't want CCC to be without moderation, but this time moderators have failed >>to do their job properly. > > >And there we disagree. blatant commercial stuff really belongs somewhere else. >The charter is not vague or unclear about that point. The charter is one thing. The way it is used another. > >> >>Bernhard I hope you understand me better now. Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.