Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:43:58 02/17/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2006 at 04:18:54, Kirill Kryukov wrote: >On February 16, 2006 at 19:24:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>I saw it here >> >>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/eval-difference-table-best-limited.shtml >> >>but you are right, this is strange. Allegedly it is 150 games but only 98 moves >>counted... So therefore all in all I concluded that the tables have no value. >>Also the background of the tables isnt discussed at all. Why this and what >>exactly... That isnt sound. I see we two are agreeing here, Uri. > >Nothing is "allegedly" in those tables. Our database is open, anyone can >download it and count the games. > >Hiarcs 10 has 391 games, and Chess Tiger 15 has 249 games in our database. This >is total number of their games. However, they playes only 3 games with each >other. That's why move count used for correlation table is so low (98 moves). >Please note that book moves are not counted for correlation, and also forced >moves and moves with evaluation of more than 900 cp. I will explain it soon in >more detail on that page. Would be very nice. Basically this is all a consequence of the internet and pressure to publish at the instant. It's interesting to watch in your table pages and more so in the Rybk Beta versions releases... Nothing wrong with that. It's more my own fault that I'm still expecting the results of month- or yearlong research when it's actually about showing one's own art brut eternalized on blog, wiki - yes, one could finally say "a quickie on wiki"... :) > >Thanks, >Kirill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.