Author: Mridul Muralidharan
Date: 08:35:55 02/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2006 at 08:32:43, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Mridul, > >On February 17, 2006 at 12:22:02, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > >>On February 17, 2006 at 11:01:46, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>> I don't know pmess, but I know Mridul. Therefor pmess is seeded to >>> low... :) I would also seed Alarm maybe a bit higher... (And Quark lower >>> when we start that discussion) >>> >>> On the other hand: like Bob has pointed out, seedings are not that important >>> with 9 rounds - finally it should give a good picture who is hot and who is >>> not anyway... > >> pmess is just a parallel version of my previous expirimental engine - so >> plays 'crazy' :-) > >Mridul, you are like Tord. You would even claim your engine to be weak if it is >number one. :) > >Greets, Thomas Heh Thomas , well - we will find it out this weekend then ! Like an IM friend of mine said - "your engine plays really interesting moves : but I think it will get killed by another chess engine". All the best with Quark ! Regards, Mridul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.