Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 12:24:11 02/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2006 at 14:51:00, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On February 18, 2006 at 05:51:45, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>There are maybe positions where the evaluation of Rybka and Fruit are similar, >>but they are not the majority. >> >>If you take a look while searching Rybka and Fruit, as well as Shredder 9, do >>consider different most of the time. >> >>Rybka is able to find good moves and often the best ones or among them nearly >>immediately so this means that the evaluation and the chess knowledge of this >>program is what it makes it stronger. >> >>Taking advantage of this and adding tactical extensions let's the program find >>good tactical moves too. >> >>It is also not true that it is weak in the endgames, but the opposite. It is >>true that this program is weak in some endgames, but not all. >> >>I am expecting Rybka to get a SSDF list Elo about 150 points above Shredder 9, >>but in May/June it will not be no. 1 anymore. >> >>Sandro > >On what basis do you claim this ? Because I could see how much SMK was able to improve his program already and I am expecting other programmers to do the same. The experience made in many years in this field can be very important...to understand what to change/improve and try new things as well... >Wayne Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.