Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:45:18 02/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2006 at 06:39:02, Orlando Mouchel wrote:
>>I won't try to give examples here, but my impression is like Vincent's. I
>>regularly compare long analysis from Fruit and Rybka in infinite mode (usually
>>several hours run time) and their evaluations are remarkably similar, in
>>general. I haven't noticed any major exceptions. But that's just my impression,
>
>Hi William Penn,(sorry for informatic traduction from french)
>My conclusion are also identical to Vincent and you.
>Indeed, I carried out several tests with "Rybka 1.0 Beta 32bit", "Fruit 2.1" and
>"Toga II 1.0" in infinite mode.
>I then noted a too great number of similarities in the sequence of discovered
>blows("coups" in french).
>The difference is that "Rybka" finds much more quickly the concrete solutions,
>while "Fruit" and "Toga II" delay.
>
>Best regards,
>Orlando
I am interested to know about a test that proves that there is big similiarity
between fruit and rybka.
I cannot see it and in analysis I simply get often different moves(often enough
to justify using both fruit and rybka for analysis).
Of course in part of the cases evaluation or moves can be similiar but it is the
case for every 2 engines.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.