Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 14:02:54 02/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2006 at 11:35:55, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >On February 18, 2006 at 08:32:43, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>Hi Mridul, >> >>On February 17, 2006 at 12:22:02, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >> >>>On February 17, 2006 at 11:01:46, Thomas Mayer wrote: >> >>>> I don't know pmess, but I know Mridul. Therefor pmess is seeded to >>>> low... :) I would also seed Alarm maybe a bit higher... (And Quark lower >>>> when we start that discussion) >>>> >>>> On the other hand: like Bob has pointed out, seedings are not that important >>>> with 9 rounds - finally it should give a good picture who is hot and who is >>>> not anyway... >> >>> pmess is just a parallel version of my previous expirimental engine - so >>> plays 'crazy' :-) >> >>Mridul, you are like Tord. You would even claim your engine to be weak if it is >>number one. :) >> >>Greets, Thomas > >Heh Thomas , well - we will find it out this weekend then ! >Like an IM friend of mine said - "your engine plays really interesting moves : >but I think it will get killed by another chess engine". > >All the best with Quark ! > >Regards, >Mridul Hey Mridul When do we get a chance to play with your engine? Also are you a Tamilian?? Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.