Author: Graham Banks
Date: 23:35:24 02/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 02:15:14, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 18, 2006 at 13:06:44, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>Hi Ray, >> >>I could prove that things stated above are well true. Could expose untrue words, >>the fact that you tried to convince longstanding CEGT testers to join the new >>group, what led to losing some testers resigning totally regarding both groups, >>because of not wanting to be in between and could tell about secret actions. > >I do not understand one thing. > >Is there a contradiction between CEGT testing and CCRL testing? > >My common sense tell me that testers can test for both teams and I see no >contradiction because the games are played in different conditions so part of >the games of the tester can be considered for CEGT and part of the games for >CCRL. > >I simply see no logical reason that people need to quit one team in order to >join the other team. > >Did one team decided that they do not accept testers if they also want to test >for the other team? > >I think that testers who feel that they express an opinion against one team by >joining CEGT and not joining CCRL or the opposite can decide to join both teams. > >Uri Hi Uri, Charles Smith belongs to both the CEGT and CCRL testing groups. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.