Author: Ray Banks
Date: 02:56:46 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 05:44:03, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >yes, this quarrel is useless and does not offer solutions. Agreed On February 19, 2006 at 05:44:03, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >The most important things for readers will be to get results in >the future from both groups. As I already told there will be > some who will like the one or the other more or even both. I certainly hope it is both ! On February 19, 2006 at 05:44:03, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > We can live with critics, but they should not come from > the "competitor" group, not from people involved, because > those are biased. I think even in amongst all this nonsense CCRL members never criticised CEGT until after extreme provocation from you. Every time we think we have peace again, then comes another outburst from you. Personally I don't believe I have ever criticised CEGT, and I won't. As I've said all along, CEGT do a great job and the latest developments such as the replay zone are excellent. At the moment of course we just concentrate on getting the number of games increased.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.