Author: Kirill Kryukov
Date: 04:01:49 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 06:44:53, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >On February 19, 2006 at 06:30:44, Kirill Kryukov wrote: > >>On February 19, 2006 at 06:19:40, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >> >>>Hi Kirill and Sarah, >>> >>>when I now start again to write what is not true in my view in Sarah´s and your >>>posts we will never come to an end and I really feel that it is enough now. No >>>one outside the teams will be able to decide between false and true statements >>>anymore. >>> >>>Fine that you also gave your view now. >>> >>>Independent of the negative things happened between you and me I wish you >>>success in the future. >>> >>>Best Regards >>>Heinz >> >>Heinz, you don't throw a bucket of dirt to an innocent person and say "it is >>enough now". At least you would not do that in real life. >> >>I expect answers to my questions and points. I expect explanations of your >>accusitions. If you agree that your attack does not have other grounds than your >>fantasy, then I expect apology, at the very least. > >Hi Kirill, > >okay, when you do not want to come to peace now... There is some danger that I >and/or others could be banned when telling all here, because of furious >counterattacks and answers and again answers and many nasty words. The fact that >Graham is moderator here makes things even more complicated and doubtful >regarding a really hard discussion about truth. > >So I propose that we exchange some emails and give a common statement here, what >we found. If you can convince me that most of the information I got is incorrect >I will have no problem to offer my excuses here openly. To be constructive this >statement could also include proposals how we can better respect one another in >the future. I will have time tomorrow or on Tuesday to write a few questions and >answers to you and this will be done honestly. For today I will have visitors >and my mood is not such to be able to discuss cold headed. Maybe we should never >have stopped those "talking to you" emails in the crisis and all would have been >easy and without anger or even worse feelings. > >I also have some questions to you regarding to a secret area in the old forum >when the split happened and if my information is correct. > >Best Regards >Heinz Now we are getting somewhere. I agree to talk by email, and to make joint statement after that. Yes, may be it would have been easier if we kept email conversation. Best, Kirill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.