Author: Graham Banks
Date: 09:58:14 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 07:20:43, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Things should be discussed better by email. I tried, but some members of the new >group refused to discuss even before the split. > >Best Regards >Heinz This isn't completely true Heinz. I tried to convince you by email to make peace with Ray and Kirill and warned you about the way both felt. However you took my advice as a threat against CEGT. It was really only after the split started to occur that the suggestion was made to discuss things properly in order to heal the rift. However, bygones are bygones. There are now the two groups. Important thing for you to know is that we've only ever wished the best for CEGT. Your work is highly respected. Sorry if you felt a big deal was made about CCRL using a slower time control. I suspect this is what made you annoyed. We do not regard ourselves as being superior. We think that all rating lists at all time controls add to the big picture. In fact, why would I have contributed games to CEGT in an unofficial capacity after leaving or have kept sending all my latest logos to host on your website if I didn't hold CEGT in such high regard? Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.