Author: Orlando Mouchel
Date: 11:30:01 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Mr. Uri Blass, [translation from French by software] I even come at the moment to read your message. Just one precision: I did not declare that there was 100% of similarities between Fruit and Rybka! I just said that I noted many similarities... Let me show you one of them: I said that regularly Rybka and Fruit 2.1/Toga II 1.0 have the same evolution in their discovery of the moves (PV). The difference is that Rybka find the serious solutions quicker. For example: [D]4r1k1/1b4pp/p7/1prP3q/2P1B3/5P2/P3Q2P/3RR2K w Bg6 - 0 1 After 3 proof, Rybka find cxb5, then it leaves it for Bg6 for a short moment and returns to cxb5. At the end it choices Bg6 definitively. Fruit 2.1/Toga II 1.0 have the same attitude, but they delay to find Bg6! ... and there are many other examples. My objective is not to criticize the n°1 Rybka, but my question is why so many similarities. Other testers also noted some comparisons with their evaluations, that I confirm in several positions. Best regards, Orlando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.