Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:40:49 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 13:07:49, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >One proposal. If I can be sure that nothing will be changed or falsified, why >not open the old CEGT forum (administrator Kryukov)for all. So everyone can see >what we all wrote there. There is nothing I have to be ashamed of, no really >evil words, but maybe some hard discussion like also by others and only in the >end. I was attacked and fought back in the last days and we had nice relations >in the beginning. You will find all there including interesting posts about >chess and testing, including psychological explanations by Uschi about group >dynamics. When doing so, you should also give the "private section" for free. Uri, yes I want to address you now, if you are really as old as I think, if you are as smart and nice as I think and if you are also willing to read what I'm telling you now, then do the right thing. The right thing is to reflect your former message with the alleged solution - if Heinz had written "this" (NB in email!!) then he should apologize and else someone else should apologize. I for one find you made a faulty message. Because even if Heinz had written that quoted part in email then this is nothing, I quote his words, where he must be ashamed of. Please reflect what you wrote and do please more. Read what Heinz wrote above. The above part of his long message shows beyond doubt - to me - that Heinz is a very valubale human with good intentions but "with something" he interesting enough applied to other people which then cause you to argue against him and others to leave. All have had their reasons but as it seems it is Heinz now who sufferes the most. And therefore I call you by your honor so that you reflect your former alternative message. Because the truth is Heinz is now completely in a trap. Although he hasnt committed a crime. And only has good intentions to do some good tests. Isnt that a moment where (former?) friends should help him out?? Perhaps everything could be worked out if all could consider how bad things are now turning? The quote you gave, Uri, doesnt contain anything significant for such a ballyhoo from all sides. You all seem to forget that this here is all in a virtual reality. So "fragile" is always meant in connection with this online writing. So, even if that has all been written, it is nothing why now someone had to suffer beyond his own defenses as a human being. We are not here to chase other people, we are not scapegoating them. I see no reason why not everybody could join a united effort to create a big testing group or groups. If you, Uri, and also others now reflect this all over and change your direction then this isnt favorable for someone or humiliating for those to change. My verdict is that objectively the whole event isnt worth sleepless nights. This isnt about death, about divorce, about losing real friends. This is all happening under the dangerous sphere of online communication with its many misunderstandings. Uri, could you do me a favor? Do also convince Kyrill that this part you quoted isnt lingually not a crime or an insult. Like you I see that Heinz is a bit in a control trap where he personally thinks that everything could go into a big chaos. But basically Heinz feels the pain of the hole the friends had left behind when they left him. The text above is the proof for that pain. Please give Heinz a helping hand without bad or twisted or hidden feelings. Just help him. I will always stand in your duty if you do this for me and in the last for Heinz of course. Yours, Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.