Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 14:36:50 02/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2006 at 13:48:09, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not know. >The main question is if the novelty is correct. Well, if you can play it and won at that level without clear mistakes on opposite sides it means it is playable...a novelty should be a playable move, but in this case the computers believe this move is weak...this is the point...as it is not. > >The fact that topalov played it and won proves nothing about the objective value >of the novelty. so far it prove it is good...of course in chess at correct play it is draw...but one must find all the best moves... > >Uri Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.