Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: reply to this one...novelties

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 15:43:40 02/19/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2006 at 17:39:30, Sandro Necchi wrote:

>On February 19, 2006 at 16:56:51, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>
>> Yes i agree that computers can't find often novelties in a reasonable time of
>>searching. But i also think that although humans more often from computers, can
>>think/find a noveltie move in the same reasonable time(since they understand
>>better the needs of a position), they can't be sure until they analyse
>>it(without help of a comp) exhaustively many many more hours. So perhaps if we
>>give the same time to the computer they will find it also....
>> Also we must agree that the combination human+computer gives far better results
>>in finding novelties.
>
>If you believe so than try to see how long it takes to a program to believe this
>move is interesting to be played...
>

 Once again you use inductive logic..... The fact that all programs can't find
THIS specific position, can't contradict none of my above statements! You should
find other arguments for that....:-)



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.