Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Open the old CEGT forum and show anyone the truth + To Uri

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 17:30:22 02/19/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2006 at 14:40:49, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On February 19, 2006 at 13:07:49, Heinz van Kempen wrote:
>
>>One proposal. If I can be sure that nothing will be changed or falsified, why
>>not open the old CEGT forum (administrator Kryukov)for all. So everyone can see
>>what we all wrote there. There is nothing I have to be ashamed of, no really
>>evil words, but maybe some hard discussion like also by others and only in the
>>end. I was attacked and fought back in the last days and we had nice relations
>>in the beginning. You will find all there including interesting posts about
>>chess and testing, including psychological explanations by Uschi about group
>>dynamics. When doing so, you should also give the "private section" for free.
>
>Uri, yes I want to address you now,
>
>if you are really as old as I think, if you are as smart and nice as I think and
>if you are also willing to read what I'm telling you now, then do the right
>thing. The right thing is to reflect your former message with the alleged
>solution - if Heinz had written "this" (NB in email!!) then he should apologize
>and else someone else should apologize. I for one find you made a faulty
>message. Because even if Heinz had written that quoted part in email then this
>is nothing, I quote his words, where he must be ashamed of. Please reflect what
>you wrote and do please more. Read what Heinz wrote above.
>
>The above part of his long message shows beyond doubt - to me - that Heinz is a
>very valubale human with good intentions but "with something" he interesting
>enough applied to other people which then cause you to argue against him and
>others to leave. All have had their reasons but as it seems it is Heinz now who
>sufferes the most. And therefore I call you by your honor so that you reflect
>your former alternative message. Because the truth is Heinz is now completely in
>a trap. Although he hasnt committed a crime. And only has good intentions to do
>some good tests.
>
>Isnt that a moment where (former?) friends should help him out?? Perhaps
>everything could be worked out if all could consider how bad things are now
>turning?
>
>The quote you gave, Uri, doesnt contain anything significant for such a ballyhoo
>from all sides. You all seem to forget that this here is all in a virtual
>reality. So "fragile" is always meant in connection with this online writing.
>So, even if that has all been written, it is nothing why now someone had to
>suffer beyond his own defenses as a human being. We are not here to chase other
>people, we are not scapegoating them.
>
>I see no reason why not everybody could join a united effort to create a big
>testing group or groups.
>
>If you, Uri, and also others now reflect this all over and change your direction
>then this isnt favorable for someone or humiliating for those to change. My
>verdict is that objectively the whole event isnt worth sleepless nights.  This
>isnt about death, about divorce, about losing real friends. This is all
>happening under the dangerous sphere of online communication with its many
>misunderstandings.
>
>Uri, could you do me a favor? Do also convince Kyrill that this part you quoted
>isnt lingually not a crime or an insult. Like you I see that Heinz is a bit in a
>control trap where he personally thinks that everything could go into a big
>chaos. But basically Heinz feels the pain of the hole the friends had left
>behind when they left him. The text above is the proof for that pain.
>
>Please give Heinz a helping hand without bad or twisted or hidden feelings. Just
>help him.
>
>I will always stand in your duty if you do this for me and in the last for Heinz
>of course.
>
>Yours, Rolf

I think that it may be better not to respond to it.

Note only that I did not claim that Heinz had bad intentions and certainly I did
not claim that he did a crime because even insulting people intentionally  is
not what I define as a crime.

A crime is defined by simple translation to hebrew as something that you can sit
in prison for a long time for doing it.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.