Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 03:19:29 02/20/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2006 at 04:55:24, Andre Reffhaug wrote: >On February 20, 2006 at 03:31:20, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>Strange to see a forced mate where Glaurung is so much faster than Crafty. >>Glaurung usually isn't a great mate finder. >> >>Tord > >It's not? In my (limited) experience with it, it seems to be a very good >matefinder, actually. I haven't tested it systematically, but it seems both very >fast and reliable. What is the reason for it not being a good matefinder? I also haven't tested it very systematically, at least not in comparison to other programs. My impression is that it generally does rather well at finding the right move quickly, but that it often needs a lot of time to announce mate. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.