Author: Kirill Kryukov
Date: 07:44:51 02/20/06
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Uri, On February 20, 2006 at 10:26:43, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that it means that you may not find strong correlation between engines >if the evaluation of one engine is twice of the evaluation of the second engine. Yes. An engine may multiply the evaluation by 1.05, or by 2, or by 10, and still play normal chess. So that "Evaluation difference" table only compares the evaluation actually reported by engines. This is why ponder hit is more reliable table - it compares only things that engines actually do on board. Expected move is much more reliable than evaluation. I am only afraid that ponder hit statistics may require larger number of games. >I think that it may be better to translate number in evaluation to expected >result and see correlation between expected results. How to translate the evaluation into expected result? You mean just to see if it is plus or minus? Hmm..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.