Author: James T. Walker
Date: 10:33:52 02/20/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2006 at 04:06:57, Richard Blood wrote: >Hi computer chess fans ! Here is another astonishing tournament ! Hardware= dual >athlon 3800+ . Each engine use generic5.ctg 32 hash ! They ran 2min 40 moves + 2 >min 40 moves tournament . Rsults stand like this ! > > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >1.Rybka 1.01 Beta 13d ***** 11=00 0=111 =1101 =1111 10111 11111 23.0/30 >2.Deep Junior 9 00=11 ***** =11=0 00110 100=0 =1111 11111 18.5/30 >3.Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI 1=000 =00=1 ***** 0=001 =1011 11111 11111 18.5/30 >4.Fritz 9 =0010 11001 1=110 ***** =0=00 1==11 11111 17.5/30 >5.Deep Fritz 8 =0000 011=1 =0100 =1=11 ***** =0011 11111 17.0/30 >6.Chess Tiger 15.0 01000 =0000 00000 00=== =1100 ***** 11111 10.5/30 >7.Shredder 9.1 UCI 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 ***** 0.0/30 > >What is so strange is that Shredder 9.1 UCI didnt win a game. I always new that >Shredder engines were weak at blitz but this is like OMG ! I don't know whats wrong with your setup but there is something wrong with your logic. Shredder is not now nor has it ever been "Weak" at blitz. Before Fruit 2.2.1 and then Rybka, Shredder9.1 UCI led my blitz database of over 35000 games. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.