Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: All S9 losses were played at depth 1 as suspected...

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 10:33:56 02/20/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 2006 at 09:51:39, Richard Blood wrote:

>Guenther you have always been critical with me , but hey no skin off my teeth!
>And for your information it is a full instilation i have :) . So your wrong
>there and the depth was not at 2, I checked that ! So before you critize someone
>plz make shure you have the facts!  Have a nice day :)


I received the games and it was like I said,
S9 always played at depth1! You wasted our time.
Why did you say above you checked the games? That was just wrong.

Shredder 9.1 UCI - Deep Junior 7 [C84]
tournament3 (2), 19.02.2006

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.d3  0.31/1  0  b5  -0.07/14  3
7.Bb3  0.48/1  0  d5  0.03/14  4  8.exd5  0.78/1  0  Nxd5  0.00/13  9  9.Re1
1.06/1  0  0-0  0.21/14  32  10.Nxe5  0.85/1  0  Nxe5  0.12/12  3  11.Rxe5
0.85/1  0  c6  0.11/13  9  12.Bxd5 (a4)  1.14/1  0  12...cxd5  0.00/11  1
13.Nc3 (d4)  0.97/1  0  13...d4  -0.04/11  3  14.Qf3  1.36/1  0  Be6 (dxc3)
-0.15/11  3  15.Ne4 (Nd5)  1.11/1  0  15...Qc7  -0.42/11  1  16.Bf4  -0.15/1  0
Qxc2  -0.37/9  0  17.Bc1 (Ng5)  -0.33/1  0  17...Rac8  -0.61/12  4  18.Qg3 (h3)
-0.84/1  0  18...Qd1# -#1/3  0  0-1

Shredder 9.1 UCI - Chess Tiger 15.0 [C05]
tournament5 (2.4), 20.02.2006

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.c3 c5 6.Bb5  1.13/1  0  Qb6  0.05/11  2
7.Qa4  1.38/1  0  a6 (cxd4)  0.04/12  16  8.Bd3  1.52/1  0  Nc6 (cxd4)  0.00/11
3  9.Ngf3 (Ne2)  0.69/1  0  9...Qa7 (cxd4)  -0.54/11  3  10.0-0  1.54/1  0  h6
(cxd4)  -0.38/11  3  11.Nb3 (Qc2)  1.49/1  0  11...b5 (cxd4)  -2.80/13  2
12.Qa3 (Bxb5)  0.94/1  0  12...cxd4  -4.68/13  2  13.Nc5 (Bxb5)  -3.69/1  0
13...Nxc5 (Bxc5)  -5.34/12  2  14.cxd4 (Bb1)  -2.89/1  0  14...b4 (Nxd3)
-8.88/14  2  15.Bb5  -7.76/1  0  bxa3  -8.86/15  3  16.Bxc6+  -8.00/1  0  Bd7
(Nd7)  -8.72/15  4  17.Bxa8  -7.49/1  0  axb2 -8.96/13  2  0-1

>
>
>On February 20, 2006 at 06:44:14, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>On February 20, 2006 at 06:23:59, Richard Blood wrote:
>>
>>>I always new shredder was weak at blitz but when i saw the results i was stunned
>>>! Shredder used default settings too !
>>
>>I bet it played at depth 2... (transferring ShredderUCI9 to another machine
>>without full installation hits the copyright protection)
>>
>>Guenther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.