Author: gerold daniels
Date: 07:37:52 02/21/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2006 at 07:32:31, Per Jørgensen wrote: >Hello Chesscomputerfriends! > >As I wrote in this Forum several times I'm making a new ratinglist. I am >using fixed openingpositions in stead of the openingsbooks of each engine >(or a common book for all engines). Here are the 10 fixed openingpositions I am >using for my tests: > >1. Queens Gambit: 1.d4, d5 2.c4 >2. Kings Gambit: 1.e4, e5 2. f4 >3. Stonewall: 1.d4, e6 2.c4, f5 3.Sc3, d5 4.Sf3, c6 >4. Caro Kann: 1.e4, c6 2.d4, d5 >5. English: 1.c4, c5 2.Sc3, Sc6 >6. Russian: 1.e4, e5 2. Sf3, Sf6 >7. King- or Grünfeldindian: 1.d4, Sf6 2.c4, g6 3.Sc3 >8. Sicilian: 1.e4, c5 2.Sf3, d6 3.d4, cxd4 >9. Queens indian: 1.d4, Sf6 2.c4, e6 3. Sf3, b6 4. g3, Lb7 5. Lg2, Le7 >10. French: 1.e4, e6 2.d4, d5 > >Every engine has got to play each openingposition with both white and black >meaning that a match between 2 engines consists of 20 games. I find that the >chosen fixed openingpositions provide a fair mix of open, tactical and closed >positional openings. I would like to thank Klaus Wlotzka (running the >CSS-Ratinglist) for support and advices in the whole process. It's my aim to >create a ratinglist of 25 top-engines. > >I'm running my tests on this Hardware: > >Asus A8V Motherboard, Socket 939, FSB 1.000 MHz >AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 2.4 GHz, 1 MB Level 2 Cache, 90 nm San Diego Core >2 x 512 MB Corsair PC 3200XLPT RAM (CAS Latency 2-2-2-5) > >And here are the specific testconditions: > >Windows XP Pro >Hiarcs 10 GUI >10 fixed openingpositions, all openingbooks for the engines are OFF >Thinkingtime for each engine: 6 min. for the whole game + 6 bonussec. pr. move >Hash Tables for each engine: 64 MB PC 3200 Ram (CAS Latency 2-2-2-5) >8 MB Cache for TB's >TB's: Nalimov - 3 und 4-pieces >Pondern OFF > >Lately I have been testing The King 3.33. Here are the testresults: > >The King 3.33 – Fruit 2.2.1 7½-12½ >The King 3.33 – Hiarcs 10 6-14 >The King 3.33 – Toga II 1.1a 7-13 >The King 3.33 – Fritz 9 9-11 >The King 3.33 – Shredder 9 5-15 >The King 3.33 – Spike 1.1 8-12 >The King 3.33 – SmarThink 1.00 8½-11½ >The King 3.33 – Ktulu 7.5 9-11 >The King 3.33 – Gandalf 6.0 14½-5½ >The King 3.33 – Naum 1.91 11-9 >The King 3.33 – Loop List 600 12-8 >The King 3.33 – Glaurung 1.0.1 13-7 >The King 3.33 – Ruffian 2.1.0 10½-9½ > >Generally The King 3.33 made a fine performance. 9-11 against Fritz 9 and a >quite huge 14½-5½ victory against Gandalf 6.0 are good results. As a result of >the latest testresults the ratinglist now looks like this: > > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > 1 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2755 36 36 260 63.3 % 2660 31.2 % > 2 Hiarcs 10 : 2752 37 37 260 62.9 % 2660 26.5 % > 3 Toga II 1.1a : 2736 35 35 260 60.6 % 2662 33.5 % > 4 Shredder 9 : 2720 36 36 260 58.1 % 2663 29.2 % > 5 Fritz 9 : 2717 36 36 260 57.7 % 2663 29.2 % > 6 Spike 1.1 : 2706 35 35 260 56.0 % 2664 32.7 % > 7 SmarThink 1.00 : 2661 35 35 260 49.0 % 2667 32.7 % > 8 Ktulu 7.5 : 2652 37 37 260 47.7 % 2668 23.8 % > 9 The King 3.33 : 2645 35 35 260 46.5 % 2669 32.3 % >10 Naum 1.91 : 2612 34 35 260 41.5 % 2671 34.6 % >11 Gandalf 6.0 : 2611 36 36 260 41.3 % 2671 28.1 % >12 Loop List 600 : 2603 37 38 260 40.2 % 2672 23.5 % >13 Glaurung 1.0.1 : 2586 38 39 260 37.7 % 2673 20.8 % >14 Ruffian 2.1.0 : 2585 36 36 260 37.5 % 2673 31.2 % > > >All engines are playing with their default-settings with exception of Hiarcs 10 >which is being tested with Hypermodern ON. > >The King 3.33 enters the list on a decent 9th position with a rating of 2645. >Before starting the test of The King 3.33 I was expecting a performance >comparable to the one of Naum, Gandalf and Loop List but as you see I was a bit >wrong. Fruit 2.2.1 managed yet again to defend its topposition but Hiarcs 10 >remains in the neck of Fruit. Shredder 9 regained rank 4 from Fritz 9 and >increased the gab to newcomer Spike 1.1 to 14 points! Still, it's worth >emphasizing the great performance of free-ware engine Spike 1.1. > >As soon as Rybka 1.1 is available I will naturally test this extraordinary >engine but in the meantime I'll make another test for my ratinglist. Next engine >to be tested is Pro Deo 1.1. > >Best regards >Per Thanks for your good work Per. I know you said you would test Rybka 1.1 when it comes out. It would be interesting if you tested the free beta version of Rybka. Gerold. P.S. Just for fun and not for the record :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.