Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:08:47 02/21/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2006 at 16:14:17, JNoomen wrote: >On February 21, 2006 at 12:14:09, F. Huber wrote: > >Hi Franz, > >The best quality is given by using the CTG format. I want the best book for >Rybka, so for me the choice was obvious. With other formats I never would have >the quality of the Rybka book that I have now. I do not see a reason for that. A lot of programs have book not in ctg format. What is the advantage of ctg format? The only reason that I can understand is if you have some ctg format book to start with but I think that it may be possible to write a program that translate ctg format to different format by simply analyzing the opening position and going backward and forward in the tree. humans can see all the book moves in the opening position play them and see all the opening books after one ply and continue in that way. If somebody writes a program that does it automatically it can find all the book moves of ctg format book. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.