Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 15:39:04 02/21/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2006 at 18:08:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 21, 2006 at 16:14:17, JNoomen wrote: > >>On February 21, 2006 at 12:14:09, F. Huber wrote: >> >>Hi Franz, >> >>The best quality is given by using the CTG format. I want the best book for >>Rybka, so for me the choice was obvious. With other formats I never would have >>the quality of the Rybka book that I have now. > >I do not see a reason for that. Uri, I know that Vasik prefer the CTG format too and he like the CB GUI, that he wrote to me. OK? ED. >A lot of programs have book not in ctg format. >What is the advantage of ctg format? > >The only reason that I can understand is if you have some ctg format book to >start with but I think that it may be possible to write a program that translate >ctg format to different format by simply analyzing the opening position and >going backward and forward in the tree. > >humans can see all the book moves in the opening position >play them and see all the opening books after one ply and continue in that way. > >If somebody writes a program that does it automatically it can find all the book >moves of ctg format book. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.