Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 04:57:27 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 07:19:39, J.Dufek wrote: >B) is right as answer for chess theory. A) is possible, but without sense to >having chance right evalute 11.Neg5. Key position is after 15.0-0-0. 15...Bd6 is >maybe not wrong, but 15...Nbd7 is better Thanks very much for your chess advice, Jiri! I will analyze the position and 15...Nbd7 and try to understand the variations a bit. It will take some time. This must be a good way to learn! I saw that Topalov did not want to repeat the line with Neg5 anymore, when it really mattered, for the World Championship in San Luis. Sergey Shipov wrote about that game "If you want to know where Black could have played better, ask Vishy". (http://www.chess.fm/chesswatch/Shipovtest/shipovmarathong0.htm) That would be nice, GM lessons about their own tournament repertoire! Whats Vishy's phonenumber? I will call him straightaway. That makes New in Chess magazine so wonderful, as the best players analyze their own games in it! But I'm not very good to profit from it.. Who needs those Informators anyway Regards, Eelco > > >On February 22, 2006 at 06:09:33, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>On February 22, 2006 at 03:55:19, J.Dufek wrote: >> >>>Thanks for analysis. >>>But your line(s) hadn't any theoretical importance. >>>Black can play better in earlier stage. >> >>Hello Jiri, I would sure be interested to see some of your analysis! I think >>there are three categories: >> >>A. Other moves for Black before 11.Neg5. No doubt about that of course. >> >>B. Between 11.Neg5 and 17... Re8 Also likely, although I think Anand played very >>well already. I could reproduce some of his moves, but only with a deep computer >>analysis. Topalov I think gave some vague hints that not everything is forced in >>New in Chess magazine 2005/5, but I don't have access to any Informator if there >>is more analysis there >> >>C. Moves after and including 17... Re8 Also possible, and also possible that >>White could come up with some different plan after 17...Re8. I only looked at >>17... Re8. But do you think that Topalov's 17.Neg5 will not be repeated at the >>highest level? Is there any analysis published about that? It could well be, as >>we are now almost a year further? Do I have to buy the Informator? >> >>Anxious Regards, Eelco >> >> >>> >>>On February 22, 2006 at 01:24:06, Eelco de Groot wrote: >>> >>>>I think this position is a bit unclear. Shredder at 16 ply only gave +0.33 for >>>>Bg5, then fail-high and fail-low. The result could be of some theorethical >>>>importance, see my post below >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?488487 But; do other programs >>>>also play 22.Bg5 and do they give a big advantage for White? >>>> >>>>[D]rnbq2k1/4r1p1/p2b1nQB/1BpP4/7N/1P4P1/P4P1P/2K1R2R w - - >>>> >>>>Engine: Shredder 9 UCI (200 MB, Athlon 2009 MHz) >>>>gemaakt door Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >>>> >>>>17 22:27 +1.02 22.Bg5 Rxe1+ 23.Rxe1 Qa5 24.Kd1 (666.458.223) 494 >>>> >>>>17 26:04 +0.43 22.Bd3 Raa7 23.Kb1 Qe8 24.Qxe8+ Rxe8 >>>> 25.Rxe8+ Nxe8 (766.596.712) 489 >>>> >>>>17 26:00 +0.38 22.Bc4 Raa7 23.f3 Qa5 24.Rxe7 Rxe7 >>>> 25.Kb1 Re1+ 26.Rxe1 Qxe1+ 27.Bc1 Qe5 >>>> 28.a3 Qe8 29.Qxe8+ Nxe8 30.Bb2 Nc7 (764.642.249) 489 >>>> >>>> Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.