Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 05:42:31 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 01:24:06, Eelco de Groot wrote: >I think this position is a bit unclear. Shredder at 16 ply only gave +0.33 for >Bg5, then fail-high and fail-low. The result could be of some theorethical >importance, see my post below >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?488487 But; do other programs >also play 22.Bg5 and do they give a big advantage for White? > >[D]rnbq2k1/4r1p1/p2b1nQB/1BpP4/7N/1P4P1/P4P1P/2K1R2R w - - > >Engine: Shredder 9 UCI (200 MB, Athlon 2009 MHz) >gemaakt door Stefan Meyer-Kahlen > >17 22:27 +1.02 22.Bg5 Rxe1+ 23.Rxe1 Qa5 24.Kd1 (666.458.223) 494 > >17 26:04 +0.43 22.Bd3 Raa7 23.Kb1 Qe8 24.Qxe8+ Rxe8 > 25.Rxe8+ Nxe8 (766.596.712) 489 > >17 26:00 +0.38 22.Bc4 Raa7 23.f3 Qa5 24.Rxe7 Rxe7 > 25.Kb1 Re1+ 26.Rxe1 Qxe1+ 27.Bc1 Qe5 > 28.a3 Qe8 29.Qxe8+ Nxe8 30.Bb2 Nc7 (764.642.249) 489 > > Eelco FEN: rnbq2k1/4r1p1/p2b1nQB/1BpP4/7N/1P4P1/P4P1P/2K1R2R w - - 0 1 Crafty-20.3 (modified): 1 00:00 3.285 3.285 +0.67 1.Bc4 1 00:00 3.451 3.451 +0.67 1.Bc4 2 00:00 3.708 3.708 +0.24 1.Bc4 Bg4 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 2 00:00 4.180 4.180 +0.45 1.Bc6 Bb7 2 00:00 245 245 +0.49 1.Rxe7 Qxe7 2.Bc4 2 00:00 4.890 244.500 +0.49 1.Rxe7 Qxe7 2.Bc4 3 00:00 5.445 272.250 +0.38 1.Rxe7 Qxe7 2.Bc6 Nxc6 3.dxc6 3 00:00 1.154 57.700 +0.42 1.Bc4 Bd7 3 00:00 9.899 494.950 +0.42 1.Bc4 Bd7 4 00:00 15.522 776.100 +0.52 1.Bc4 Bg4 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 3.Kb1 4 00:00 29.047 1.452.350 +0.52 1.Bc4 Bg4 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 3.Kb1 5 00:00 44.837 1.494.566 +0.57 1.Bc4 Kh8 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 3.Be3 5 00:00 91.726 1.834.520 +0.57 1.Bc4 Kh8 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 3.Be3 6 00:00 131.375 2.189.583 +0.48 1.Bc4 Kh8 2.Rxe7 Qxe7 3.Bg5 Bd7 6 00:00 36.947 284.207 +0.50 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qc7 6 00:00 344.648 2.461.771 +0.50 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qc7 7 00:00 545.414 2.479.154 +0.24 1.Bg5 Rxe1+ 2.Rxe1 Qa5 3.Re8+ Nxe8 4.Qxe8+ Bf8 5.Ba4 7 00:00 927.548 2.576.522 +0.74 1.Bd3 Qf8 2.Bg5 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qf7 4.Bxf6 Qxg6 5.Nxg6 gxf6 7 00:01 1.087.607 2.589.540 +0.74 1.Bd3 Qf8 2.Bg5 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qf7 4.Bxf6 Qxg6 5.Nxg6 gxf6 8 00:01 1.618.448 2.653.193 +0.81 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Nf5 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Bf8 4.Bg5 Qxd5 5.Nh6+ Kh8 6.Bxf6 gxf6 7.Qxf6+ 8 00:01 1.942.802 2.698.336 +0.81 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Nf5 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Bf8 4.Bg5 Qxd5 5.Nh6+ Kh8 6.Bxf6 gxf6 7.Qxf6+ 9 00:01 2.714.745 2.714.745 +0.87 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Bxf5 Rab7 4.Be6+ Kh8 9 00:01 3.080.631 2.726.222 +0.87 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Bxf5 Rab7 4.Be6+ Kh8 10 00:02 6.056.237 2.803.813 +0.86 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Bf5 c4 3.Rxe7 Rxe7 4.bxc4 Qc7 5.Bd3 10 00:03 7.527.201 2.851.212 +0.86 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Bf5 c4 3.Rxe7 Rxe7 4.bxc4 Qc7 5.Bd3 11 00:08 22.752.244 2.844.030 +0.85 1.Bd3 Raa7 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Bxf5 Rac7 4.Re6 Rcd7 11 00:14 17.343.831 1.175.852 +1.03 1.Bg5 Qf8 2.Bd3 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Nbd7 4.Nf5 Bb7 5.Nxd6 Qxd6 6.Bh6 Qf8 7.d6 Rd8 11 00:14 42.907.385 3.064.813 +1.03 1.Bg5 Qf8 2.Bd3 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Nbd7 4.Nf5 Bb7 5.Nxd6 Qxd6 6.Bh6 Qf8 7.d6 Rd8 12 00:19 59.064.839 3.108.675 +1.17 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kg7 7.Nf5+ Kg6 8.d6 Kxf5 9.Rxf8 12 00:22 67.691.091 3.076.867 +1.17 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kg7 7.Nf5+ Kg6 8.d6 Kxf5 9.Rxf8 13 00:30 90.206.550 3.006.885 +1.11 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kf7 7.Kb1 Be7 8.Nf5 13 00:36 109.968.155 3.054.670 +1.11 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kf7 7.Kb1 Be7 8.Nf5 14 00:53 163.188.802 3.079.034 +1.12 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kf7 7.Rc7+ Kg8 8.Kb1 Na6 9.Rd7 14 01:04 198.166.094 3.096.345 +1.12 1.Bg5 axb5 2.Bxf6 Rxe1+ 3.Rxe1 Qxf6 4.Re8+ Bf8 5.Qxf6 gxf6 6.Rxc8 Kf7 7.Rc7+ Kg8 8.Kb1 Na6 9.Rd7
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.