Author: David Dahlem
Date: 10:48:07 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 13:19:12, Jay Urbanski wrote: >On February 22, 2006 at 03:06:03, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>On February 21, 2006 at 23:12:35, Jay Urbanski wrote: >> >>>see previous message >> >>Hello Jay, I think a lot to be said for that but there may be practical and >>commercial reasons for Jeroen and Vasik. I don't have any Chessbase programs and >>also not bought Rybka, but I can believe that for Jeroen, Chessbase has the best >>options for his bookediting work. That was why even Pro Deo ran in Chessbase GUI >>in Leiden the last years, something almost amounting to blasphemy... If I may >>use that word... So in fact we have a de facto industry standard for bookmakers >>that is not free, and because it is not, converting a ctg book to another format >>is not easy. Not much to be done about it I think... >> >> Regards, Eelco > >I wonder how much work it would be to reverse engineer the .CTG format? Is that legal? Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.