Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: StB-Ratinglists - SmarThink 1.00 - Final Results

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 15:40:21 02/22/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 22, 2006 at 14:35:38, ThatsIt wrote:

>Hi to * !
>
>For details have a look at http://www.pcschach.de ---> RANGLISTEN
>
>---> Level 40moves/15min. + 40/15 + 40/15 + ...
>
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Chess Tiger 15.0    23.5 - 26.5  (+16 =15 -19)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Fritz 9             16.0 - 34.0  (+13 =06 -31)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Fruit 2.2           13.5 - 36.5  (+06 =15 -29)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Gandalf 6           27.0 - 23.0  (+21 =12 -17)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Hiarcs 10           23.0 - 27.0  (+14 =18 -18)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Ktulu 7.1           24.0 - 26.0  (+13 =22 -15)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Loop List Release   25.5 - 24.5  (+17 =17 -16)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Ruffian 2.1.0       28.0 - 22.0  (+19 =18 -13)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Rybka 1.0           15.5 - 34.5  (+09 =13 -28)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Shredder 9 UCI      21.0 - 29.0  (+14 =14 -22)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Spike 1.0a Mainz    22.0 - 28.0  (+14 =16 -20)
>
>
>---> Level 40moves/3min. + 40/3 + 40/3 + ...
>
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Chess Tiger 15.0    20.5 - 29.5  (+10 =21 -19)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Fritz 9             23.0 - 27.0  (+15 =16 -19)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Fruit 2.2           12.0 - 38.0  (+06 =12 -32)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Gandalf 6           29.5 - 20.5  (+22 =15 -13)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Hiarcs 10           15.5 - 34.5  (+09 =13 -28)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Ktulu 7.1           23.5 - 26.5  (+15 =17 -18)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Loop List Release   20.0 - 30.0  (+12 =16 -22)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Ruffian 2.1.0       29.0 - 21.0  (+21 =16 -13)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Rybka 1.0           16.0 - 34.0  (+08 =16 -26)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Shredder 9 UCI      17.5 - 32.5  (+10 =15 -25)
>SmarThink 1.00 vs Spike 1.0a Mainz    26.5 - 23.5  (+18 =17 -15)
>
>Both ratinglists can be found at
>http://www.pcschach.de ---> RANGLISTEN
>
>Best to all.
>
>G.S.


Thanks for the update Gerhard.
All these rating lists add to the big picture.
People carry on about statistical anomalies with regard to the number of games
played by testers, but if rating lists are consistent and tournament results are
consistent, then that's enough evidence for me!

Regards, Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.