Author: Greg Simpson
Date: 17:54:59 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 18:44:33, James T. Walker wrote: >I find it interesting that even though one time control is almost 5 times longer >than the other, the results are almost identical. >Jim I was struck by how different the rating lists were, especially that the poor results of Rybka at three minutes are at least close to statistically significant. On reflection, I believe this may at least partially be a real difference, caused by the poor time management of Rybka 1.0 in short games. Rybka 1.0 also seems to perform relatively worse at blitz in CEGT, although not by a large amount.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.