Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:43:37 02/23/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 20:54:59, Greg Simpson wrote: >On February 22, 2006 at 18:44:33, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I find it interesting that even though one time control is almost 5 times longer >>than the other, the results are almost identical. >>Jim > >I was struck by how different the rating lists were, especially that the poor >results of Rybka at three minutes are at least close to statistically >significant. On reflection, I believe this may at least partially be a real >difference, caused by the poor time management of Rybka 1.0 in short games. > >Rybka 1.0 also seems to perform relatively worse at blitz in CEGT, although not >by a large amount. I assume you are talking about the rating list somewhere else. I'm referring to the results posted above. Not only are Rybkas results almost identical, Smarthinks results are almost identical for the two time controls. (239-311 and 233-317)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.