Author: Per Jørgensen
Date: 13:12:26 02/23/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2006 at 14:10:06, Tansel Turgut wrote: >Is there a big playing strength between fruit 2.1 (free version) and Fruit >2.2.1? > >is it worth buying the commercial version? > >Thanks Hello Tansel! No doubt, Fruit 2.2.1 is among the best engines of today and stronger than Fruit 2.1. In fact it is leading my own ratinglist: Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws 1 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2755 36 36 260 63.3 % 2660 31.2 % 2 Hiarcs 10 : 2752 37 37 260 62.9 % 2660 26.5 % 3 Toga II 1.1a : 2736 35 35 260 60.6 % 2662 33.5 % 4 Shredder 9 : 2720 36 36 260 58.1 % 2663 29.2 % 5 Fritz 9 : 2717 36 36 260 57.7 % 2663 29.2 % 6 Spike 1.1 : 2706 35 35 260 56.0 % 2664 32.7 % 7 SmarThink 1.00 : 2661 35 35 260 49.0 % 2667 32.7 % 8 Ktulu 7.5 : 2652 37 37 260 47.7 % 2668 23.8 % 9 The King 3.33 : 2645 35 35 260 46.5 % 2669 32.3 % 10 Naum 1.91 : 2612 34 35 260 41.5 % 2671 34.6 % 11 Gandalf 6.0 : 2611 36 36 260 41.3 % 2671 28.1 % 12 Loop List 600 : 2603 37 38 260 40.2 % 2672 23.5 % 13 Glaurung 1.0.1 : 2586 38 39 260 37.7 % 2673 20.8 % 14 Ruffian 2.1.0 : 2585 36 36 260 37.5 % 2673 31.2 % Still, Toga II 1.1a is really a strong alternative. It's based on Fruit 2.1 and it's a free-ware engine. In my ratinglist it is 19 points behind Fruit 2.2.1 but I have seen other ratnglists in which Toga II 1.1a is in front of Fruit 2.2.1 (if only by a small margin). Regards Per
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.