Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 12:31:47 02/24/06

Go up one level in this thread

On February 24, 2006 at 15:30:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>On February 24, 2006 at 15:00:06, Chris Fieberg wrote:
>
>>On February 24, 2006 at 14:52:05, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>Which would not have played Rybka is importantly here, since each game is
>>>another, and Rybkas Analyses are other as when Rybka play!
>>
>>Do you think it would be possible to use your concept also against Rybka? I
>>suppose it would be at least much harder.

Are you a Rybka Fanatiker?

Can we talk not also about something else than about which became Rybka? :-((

That is pure speculation!

Do we talk now about spike, OK?

• Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chris Fieberg 12:58:09 02/24/06
  • Re: Tell me more about spike if you want - here Eduard Nemeth 15:47:47 02/25/06
  • Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eduard Nemeth 13:35:09 02/24/06
  • Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chris Fieberg 13:07:30 02/24/06
    • Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eduard Nemeth 13:39:10 02/24/06
• Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Graham Banks 12:43:29 02/24/06
  • Re: I wrote about Spike 1.1 and not Rybka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rolf Tueschen 13:45:52 02/24/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.