Author: Graham Banks
Date: 12:43:29 02/24/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2006 at 15:31:47, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On February 24, 2006 at 15:30:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On February 24, 2006 at 15:00:06, Chris Fieberg wrote: >> >>>On February 24, 2006 at 14:52:05, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>Which would not have played Rybka is importantly here, since each game is >>>>another, and Rybkas Analyses are other as when Rybka play! >>> >>>Do you think it would be possible to use your concept also against Rybka? I >>>suppose it would be at least much harder. > >Are you a Rybka Fanatiker? > >Can we talk not also about something else than about which became Rybka? :-(( > >That is pure speculation! > >Do we talk now about spike, OK? It was a fair question Eduard, undeserving of the response you gave. I'd like to ask a question also. How can you get any satisfaction out of winning like this? Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.