Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:45:52 02/24/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2006 at 15:43:29, Graham Banks wrote: >On February 24, 2006 at 15:31:47, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On February 24, 2006 at 15:30:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On February 24, 2006 at 15:00:06, Chris Fieberg wrote: >>> >>>>On February 24, 2006 at 14:52:05, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>> >>>>>Which would not have played Rybka is importantly here, since each game is >>>>>another, and Rybkas Analyses are other as when Rybka play! >>>> >>>>Do you think it would be possible to use your concept also against Rybka? I >>>>suppose it would be at least much harder. >> >>Are you a Rybka Fanatiker? >> >>Can we talk not also about something else than about which became Rybka? :-(( >> >>That is pure speculation! >> >>Do we talk now about spike, OK? > > >It was a fair question Eduard, undeserving of the response you gave. >I'd like to ask a question also. How can you get any satisfaction out of winning >like this? > >Regards, Graham. Interesting, that you think that your question is a fair question.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.