Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Eduard Nemeth vs. Spike 1.1 1-0 (on playchess 10m + 3s) !

Author: Joshua Shriver

Date: 20:31:59 02/24/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 24, 2006 at 15:46:51, Sune Larsson wrote:

>It's just that this shuffling anti-chess is killing your own creativity. By
>repeating the same moves, the same blocking plans all over and over again - you
>are destroying your own chess. That's almost a sin - at least it's tremendously
>boring to watch. Then after 258 moves if it's 1-0, ½-½ or 0-1 - is just
>uninteresting.
>
>
>/S

Guess depends on the reason people look at his games. If you're looking for
classic gaming then something in the myriad of GM db's would be more
interesting.

Though at least for me, I enjoy reading his games even if there is repetition
because it shows a consistant problem in chess engines. If he can do it then it
could be learned and anyone could use this as a fundamental flaw when playing
against computers. I'm curious if any GM's who've played against computers (DB,
Hydra, etc) have tried similiar anti-computer-chess techniques.

-Josh



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.