Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 01:30:58 02/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2006 at 23:31:59, Joshua Shriver wrote: >On February 24, 2006 at 15:46:51, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>It's just that this shuffling anti-chess is killing your own creativity. By >>repeating the same moves, the same blocking plans all over and over again - you >>are destroying your own chess. That's almost a sin - at least it's tremendously >>boring to watch. Then after 258 moves if it's 1-0, ½-½ or 0-1 - is just >>uninteresting. >> >> >>/S > >Guess depends on the reason people look at his games. If you're looking for >classic gaming then something in the myriad of GM db's would be more >interesting. > >Though at least for me, I enjoy reading his games even if there is repetition >because it shows a consistant problem in chess engines. If he can do it then it >could be learned and anyone could use this as a fundamental flaw when playing >against computers. I'm curious if any GM's who've played against computers (DB, >Hydra, etc) have tried similiar anti-computer-chess techniques. > >-Josh You mean blocking the whole board - repeating moves back and forth - then winning on time after 258 moves. No - there isn't any GM who played that way vs a chess program (or GUI). Guess some people can find personal satisfaction in such a win though - at least if you consider the posted games human-GUI on this board. Good luck in your own efforts though! /S
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.